Month: September 2012 (page 1 of 14)

dioxin causes reproductive problems

2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, referred to as dioxin, is a contaminant in Agent Orange. It is toxic and known to cause developmental defects and cancer.

From Science Daily:

 Since the 1960s, when the defoliant Agent Orange was widely used in Vietnam, military, industry and environmental groups have debated the toxicity of one of its ingredients, the chemical dioxin, and how it should be regulated.

But even if all the dioxin were eliminated from the planet, Washington State University researchers say its legacy would live on in the way it turns genes on and off in the descendants of people exposed over the past half century.

Writing in the journal PLoS ONE, biologist Michael Skinner and members of his lab say dioxin administered to pregnant rats resulted in a variety of reproductive problems and disease in subsequent generations. The first generation of rats had prostate disease, polycystic ovarian disease and fewer ovarian follicles, the structures that contain eggs. To the surprise of Skinner and his colleagues, the third generation had even more dramatic incidences of ovarian disease and, in males, kidney disease.

“Therefore, it is not just the individuals exposed, but potentially the great-grandchildren that may experience increased adult-onset disease susceptibility,” says Skinner.

sars-like virus has bat origins

Genomic sequencing  of a SARS-like virus suggests retlation to a virus that is known to infect bats. From NPR news:

Dutch virologists have just published the whole genome of the new coronavirus — all 30,118 letters of its code. And, the sequence reveals that the mystery virus is most closely related to coronaviruses that infect bats in Southeast Asia.

In fact, the pathogen is more similar to two bat viruses than it is to the human SARS virus that sent the world into a panic when it infected nearly 8,000 people in 2003.

Virologist Ron Fouchier, who has done controversial work on bird flu viruses, led the sequencing effort of the SARS-like virus. He tells Shots the results suggest that the new coronavirus virus came from bats. “Bats harbor many coronaviruses, so it’s logical to assume that bats are the natural reservoir” of the new pathogen, he says.

“But this doesn’t mean the Saudi man contracted the virus from bats,” says Fouchier.

When viruses jump from animals to humans, there’s usually a second animal that connects the natural carrier with humans. This species is called the amplifier because it increases the number of viral particles that can hop over into people.

links

Here’s some interesting science linkage for you:

After pregnancy, women have male DNA fragments in their brains. [Popular Science]

How do we know humans are getting smarter? [Scientific Americana book excerpt]

Cool science images. [Popular Science]

How oblate is the sun? [Science, subscription required; summary available]

Obvious gender bias found in scientific disciplines. [Science, subscription required; summary available]

 

Enjoy!

//woafoame.net/4/4535925