Date: 02.07.2013

bacteria colonizing the antarctic

Lake Whillans

This drill recovered intact water samples from Lake Whillans

The New York Times has an interesting write up on the discovery of bacteria species in one of the frozen lakes of Antarctica. The bacteria were found about four feet deep in the sediment of Lake Whillans. They survive apparently requiring little oxygen or exposure to sunlight. Bacterial species have been previously discovered but the possibility of contamination couldn’t be ruled out during the previous expeditions. Here’s an excerpt on the discovery from the article:

After drilling through a half-mile of ice into the 23-square-mile, 5-foot-deep Lake Whillans, the expedition scientists recovered water and sediment samples that showed clear signs of life, Dr. Priscu said, speaking from McMurdo Station in Antarctica on Tuesday. They saw cells under a microscope, and chemical tests showed that the cells were alive and metabolizing energy.

Dr. Priscu said that every precaution had been taken to prevent contamination of the lake with bacteria from the surface or the overlying ice. In addition, he said, the concentrations of life were higher in the lake than in the borehole, and there were signs of life in the lake bottom’s sediment, which would be sealed off from contamination.

Much more study, including DNA analysis, is needed to determine what kinds of bacteria have been found and how they live, Dr. Priscu said. There is no sunlight, so the bacteria must depend on organic material that has drifted into the lake from other sources — for instance, decaying microbes from melting glaciers — or on minerals in the rock of the Antarctic continent.

More here.

pollution linked to smaller babies

pollution

Pollution in the air is linked to the birth of underweight newborns

In a new study, published in Environmental Health Perspectives this week, shows that high levels of pollution are linked to smaller babies. The study looked at levels of particulate mater (PM) in the United States, Korea and Brazil and correlated it to the weight of newborns.  From Scientific American:

By the authors’ calculations, each increase in PM10 by 10 micrograms per cubic meter (μg m–3) was associated with a 3% higher chance of an infant being underweight and with an overall average weight reduced by 3 grams. That reduction in average weight tripled to 9 g when the authors adjusted for local variables such as maternal age or tobacco use. The calculations took socioeconomic status into account.

The median PM10 value varied across the 14 sites, from 12.5 μg m–3 in Vancouver to 66.5 μg m–3 in Seoul. For a subset of centers that included information on PM2.5exposure, the odds of lower birth weight increased by 10% for each increase in exposure.

As Trasande explains, the risks are small at the individual level, but “on a population basis, a shift can produce large increases in the percentage of low-birth-weight infants”, he says. Smoking, alcohol and drug use and poor maternal health are also linked to low birth weights.

In a study of more than 220,000 US births published last month, Trasande and his colleagues found that outdoor air pollution was associated with longer hospital stays and greater health-care costs. In 2010, 8.2% of infants born in the United States were of low birth weight.

XKCD determines when internet bandwidth will catch up with FedEx.

//chouthep.net/4/4535925