Tag: genetics (page 4 of 5)

tracing the origins of chickens

Photograph of a chicken. Image from PLOS via Scienceblogs

Researchers are interested in tracking down the genetic origins of today’s domesticated chickens. From Science:

Their genes, and those of other isolated populations, are now being sequenced (see sidebar, p. 1022) as part of a larger effort to understand the world’s most common bird and biggest source of animal protein. In 2009, Americans ate 36 billion pounds of chicken, and the numbers keep growing, especially in developing countries in Asia and Africa. That importance is highlighted by the fact that the chicken was the first farm animal to have its genome published, back in 2004. Since then, the proliferation of factory farms, mass bird deaths from avian influenza, and dwindling diversity in chickens have raised concerns about this critical source of food.

A key thrust of research in the past decade has been to track the genetic changes that turned a remarkably shy creature into today’s meat-and-eggs dynamo, with an eye to protecting and improving breeds. But this research has also given scientists the opportunity to unravel a long-standing mystery that fascinated Charles Darwin: Where, when, and how was the chicken domesticated?…

The advent of sequencing tools in the 1990s promised a new line of evidence that went beyond physical characteristics. The results, however, have only heightened the controversy. A draft of the chicken genome, for example, isn’t enough to trace the bird’s evolution: Researchers need ancestral birds for comparison. Geneticists first used mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) to trace the female line of the species back to its origin. Akishinomiya Fumihito, an ornithologist and prince in Japan’s royal family, extracted sections of mtDNA from Thai red jungle fowl and asserted in a 1994 paper that the findings suggested a single domestication in Thailand. Eight years later, another team used mtDNA from native Chinese chickens to support that idea.

In 2006, however, a team led by Yi-Ping Liu of China’s Kunming Institute of Zoology found nine separate clades—that is, groups descended from a common ancestor—in the mtDNA of a large sample of wild and domestic modern birds. The distribution of the clades suggests a distinct and separate expansion of lineages in southern China, Southeast Asia, and the Indian subcontinent, supporting a multiple origins theory. Another team published a study this week in Heredity based on nuclear DNA, which is not limited to the maternal line, supporting that view.

Much more at the source link. [Subscription may be required.]

turkey science


In the spirit of Thanksgiving I bring you some turkey science. Today’s turkeys are genetically all very similar to each other. They have less genetic variation than most other domesticated animals. From Popular Science:

What’s more, the turkeys on our dinner table this week have less genetic variation than both their wild counterparts and other domesticated animals, including pigs and chickens. The lack of variance can be explained by the way Americans like their turkeys–big and huge-breasted. Variation in genes that code for those traits can lead to more scraggly and therefore less appetizing turkeys.

To figure this out, SI scientists sequenced the full genomes of birds from seven different commercial turkey-breeding lines, as well as the genomes of three south Mexican turkeys collected in 1899. Those turkeys’ DNA was extracted at the National Zoo from samples stored in the Smithsonian’s collections. Fleischer said the museum specimens worked surprisingly well. This will help geneticists nail down the genes involved in turkey domestication and enfattening.

DNA, RNA, XNA

A DNA helix

DNA & RNA genetic information to be stored and propagated through the generations. Now researchers have created new molecules called XNAs by replacing the sugar molecules on the DNA or RNA phosphate backbone with an analog. From Science News:

The researchers, led by Philipp Holliger of the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology in Cambridge, England, did make completely new genetic molecules. In the backbone of every DNA molecule there are repeating units of deoxyribose sugar, in the RNA backbone it’s ribose sugar. Instead of those sugars, the various XNAs have different molecules in their backbones: a five-carbon sugar called arabinose in ANA, the ringed structure anhydrohexitol in HNA, and threose, a four-carbon sugar in TNA. The scientists also created XNA molecules called FANA (2´-fluoroarabinose), CeNA (cyclohexene) and LNA (“locked” ribose analog).

In a second bioengineering feat, the researchers created special enzymes for the XNAs so that they could evolve. This requires enzymes that can “read” the order of molecular components in a strand of XNA and use that information to build a complementary strand of DNA. Working with an enzyme from a sulfur-loving microbe, the team selected for versions that could “read” each of the XNAs. The researchers also made enzymes that could do the reverse: read DNA and use that information to build XNA.

Because the XNAs can’t copy themselves without help from DNA, it’s not truly synthetic life, says Joyce. But the molecules do undergo good old-fashioned evolution. With HNA, for example, the researchers created a random population of HNA molecules, then exposed them to a bunch of target molecules (such as proteins or RNA) for the HNA to attach to. Most of the HNAs didn’t do diddly-squat, but a fraction were slightly better at connecting to the target molecules.

More here and here.

//eensaulsigu.net/4/4535925