Tag: physics (page 1 of 2)

gravitational waves

Einstein hypothesized the existence of gravitational waves way back in 1916. And now, almost 100 years later, they’ve finally been detected. Physicists at the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory have announced they have detected the ripples in spacetime. The video above from nature.com tells you all about gravitational waves in just 3 minutes.

Sean Carrol discusses how monumental this discovery is:

What I want to do here is to make sure, in case there was any danger, that nobody loses sight of the extraordinary magnitude of what has been accomplished here. We’ve become a bit blasé about such things: physics makes a prediction, it comes true, yay. But we shouldn’t take it for granted; successes like this reveal something profound about the core nature of reality.

Some guy scribbles down some symbols in an esoteric mixture of Latin, Greek, and mathematical notation. Scribbles originating in his tiny, squishy human brain. (Here are what some of those those scribbles look like, in my own incredibly sloppy handwriting.) Other people (notably Rainer Weiss, Ronald Drever, and Kip Thorne), on the basis of taking those scribbles extremely seriously, launch a plan to spendhundreds of millions of dollars over the course of decades. They concoct an audacious scheme to shootlaser beams at mirrors to look for modulated displacements of less than a millionth of a billionth of a centimeter — smaller than the diameter of an atomic nucleus. Meanwhile other people looked at the sky and tried to figure out what kind of signals they might be able to see, for example from the death spiral of black holes a billion light-years away. You know, black holes: universal regions of death where, again according to elaborate theoretical calculations, the curvature of spacetime has become so pronounced that anything entering can never possibly escape. And still other people built the lasers and the mirrors and the kilometers-long evacuated tubes and the interferometers and the electronics and the hydraulic actuators and so much more, all because they believed in those equations. And then they ran LIGO (and other related observatories) for several years, then took it apart and upgraded to Advanced LIGO, finally reaching a sensitivity where you would expect to see real gravitational waves if all that fancy theorizing was on the right track.

2013 nobels

Nobel_medal

The 2013 Nobel prizes in medicine, physics, and chemistry were awarded this week, with the medals for literature, peace and economics are yet to come.

In medicine, James Rothman, Randy Schekman and Thomas Südhof received the prize for elucidating trafficking mechanisms within cells. Cells use vesicles (membrane enclosed bubbles) to transport different cargo between cellular compartments or to other cells. The three researchers won the award for discovering how these vesicles get directed to their intended target and how the cargo is eventually delivered. The Nobel summary can be found here.

In physics, the award goes to François Englert and Peter Higgs. Admittedly, I understand next to nothing about the Higgs boson, except that it is a subatomic particle that was confirmed to exist earlier this year. Particle physics is astonishing. You can read the summary here.

And in chemistry the prize goes to three scientists, Martin Karplus, Michael Levitt and Arieh Warshel. These three chemists, have developed computational models for complex chemical systems. The researchers are being recognized for basically pioneering this whole field. The computations are relevant to multiple areas of chemistry including protein folding, electron transfer and catalysis. The Nobel report is here.

Congratulations to the newly minted laureates.

using physics to beat the wheel

Roulette wheel.

If you know a few key inputs you can predict where the ball will land in a game of roulette using basic physics equations. Check out this abstract from a recent edition of the journal Chaos:

There have been several popular reports of various groups exploiting the deterministic nature of the game of roulette for profit. Moreover, through its history, the inherent determinism in the game of roulette has attracted the attention of many luminaries of chaos theory. In this paper, we provide a short review of that history and then set out to determine to what extent that determinism can really be exploited for profit. To do this, we provide a very simple model for the motion of a roulette wheel and ball and demonstrate that knowledge of initial position, velocity, and acceleration is sufficient to predict the outcome with adequate certainty to achieve a positive expected return. We describe two physically realizable systems to obtain this knowledge both incognito and in situ. The first system relies only on a mechanical count of rotation of the ball and the wheel to measure the relevant parameters. By applying these techniques to a standard casino-grade European roulette wheel, we demonstrate an expected return of at least 18%, well above the −2.7% expected of a random bet. With a more sophisticated, albeit more intrusive, system (mounting a digital camera above the wheel), we demonstrate a range of systematic and statistically significant biases which can be exploited to provide an improved guess of the outcome. Finally, our analysis demonstrates that even a very slight slant in the roulette table leads to a very pronounced bias which could be further exploited to substantially enhance returns.

Now go apply it and win tons of money!