Month: October 2012 (page 8 of 10)

arsenate or phosphate controversy put to bed

Arsenate

A while back some scientists thought they had discovered a bacteria that could thrive on arsenic. They hypothesized that arsenic was being incorporated into the organism’s molecules in place of phosphorus without any problem. This was later discovered to be incorrect. A paper in Nature Magazine details how bacteria discriminate between arsenic and phosphorus.  From Scientific American:

“This work provides in a sense an answer to how GFAJ-1 (and related bacteria) can thrive in very high arsenic concentrations,” say Tobias Erb and Julia Vorholt of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, co-authors of the latest paper, who were also co-authors on a follow-up paper that cast doubt on the initial arsenic-life claims.

The researchers looked at five types of phosphate-binding protein — which bind phosphate in a molecular pathway that brings it into the cells — from four species of bacteria. Two of the bacterial species were sensitive to arsenate and two were resistant to it. To test how effective these proteins were at discriminating between phosphate and arsenate, the researchers put them in solution with a set amount of phosphate and different concentrations of arsenate for 24 hours, and then checked which of the molecules the proteins would bind to.

Their threshold for when ‘discrimination’ broke down was when 50% of the proteins ended up bound to arsenate — indicating that the ability to discriminate had been overwhelmed. Even in solutions containing 500-fold more arsenate than phosphate, all five proteins were still able to preferentially bind phosphate. And one protein, from the Mono Lake bacterium, could do so at arsenate excesses of up to 4,500-fold over phosphate.

The paper includes detailed structures of both phosphate and arsenate bound to bacterial protein. You can see how the arsenate’s larger size impedes protein binding. Please check out the source link for more.

babies learn race pretty early

Babies learn to differentiate race pretty early in their lives. From Scientific American:

When babies are five months old, they can distinguish among faces of all races equally well. Past studies show they can, for instance, match a happy sound with many kinds of happy faces with equal ease. Yet by nine months, babies react more swiftly to their own race than others: they differentiate more readily between faces and match emotional sounds with facial expressions faster. A study from the University of Massachusetts Amherst, published in May in Developmental Science, showed that the younger infants use only the frontal part of the brain for the task. By nine months, babies also recruit the occipital-temporal region, where recognition happens in adults.

new dinosaur species

Pegomastax is one of the smallest dinosaur species ever discovered.

The New York Times reports on the unveiling of a new species of dinosaur that was discovered quite some time ago. The new species is called Pegomastax and  it is one of the smallest dinosaurs ever discovered. The rock containing the fossil was found in 1963 and the discovery of the species occured back in 1983. The discovery is just being made public. Pegomastax is believed to have been an herbivore:

His close examination showed that behind the parrot-shaped beak were a pair of stabbing canines up front and a set of tall teeth tucked behind for slicing plants. These teeth in upper and lower jaws operated like self-sharpening scissors, Dr. Sereno said, with shearing wear facets that slid past one another when the jaws closed. The parrotlike skull, he noted, may have been adapted to plucking fruit.

Dr. Sereno said it was “very rare that a plant-eater like Pegomastax would sport sharp-edged enlarged canines.” Some scientists suggested that the creature may have consumed some meat, or at least insects.

In his new study, Dr. Sereno concluded that the creature’s fangs, unusual for a herbivore, were probably “for nipping and defending themselves, not for eating meat.” Other aspects about the new species and other heterodontosaurs, including their chewing mechanism, are evolutionary surprises, he said, and “their anatomy is key to understanding the early evolution of this great group of plant eaters.”

//taujouphoovy.net/4/4535925