Year: 2012 (page 6 of 55)

does viagra boost atheltic peformance?

How would that even work? From Popular Science:

Here’s the theory of why it would work: Viagra chemically relaxes muscles and opens arteries to help blood flow more easily. (To help it flow easily all over the body, but, you know, there’s the primary mission.) With the blood flowing more easily, oxygen moves to the muscles more easily, which can (theoretically) improve endurance during competition. That’s something like the idea that altitude training will improve your oxygen flow and help you move longer distances without tiring, which it does.

But it’s unlikely to make much of a difference.

Catlin also suggests that any improvement would be miniscule (although minuscule can sometimes matter). More to the point, athletes could gain that minuscule advantage elsewhere, without having to ask their doctor for erectile dysfunction pills. Altitude training, the process of switching between living at high altitudes and training at low altitudes, could improve performance by 1 to 1.5 percent. That doesn’t sound like much, but even that might be more useful than Viagra. Beyond that, illicit substances would make for a relatively major increase in performance, much higher than what an athlete would get from Viagra.

So if that increase is so small, why would athletes use Viagra? Because players have heard (incorrectly, maybe, especially in the case of football players) it increases performance, even if just a smidgen. That’s enough of a reason for some athletes. Plus, it’s not banned in competitive use. Without some major evidence, Catlin says, official organizations like the World Anti-Doping Agency won’t place a ban on a medication for a necessarily discreet problem. (“Excuse us, but we need to make a formal display of this condition before you compete.”)

how old is the grand canyon

Image from yabbedoo travel & tech.

Conventional wisdom has it that the Grand Canyon was carved out by the Colorado some 6-7 million years ago.  Now, new chemical studies of the helium spectra of  Canyon rock are calling that wisdom into question claiming that the canyon is over 60 million years old. From Science News:

But the new study, reported online November 29 in Science, looks instead at the chemistry of rocks exposed throughout the canyon. Rocks get cooler as erosion strips away the material above them. That cooling is chemically preserved in several ways, including in helium within the mineral apatite.

“When the apatite is hot, the helium simply diffuses out of the crystal; when the apatite is cold, helium is completely retained,” says study leader Rebecca Flowers of the University of Colorado Boulder. “So by measuring the helium we are constraining when the rock went from hot to cold as it moved closer to the Earth’s surface, or as the Earth’s surface moved closer to the rock as the canyon was carved.”

Flowers and Kenneth Farley of Caltech looked at helium in apatite crystals throughout the canyon, including how the element was distributed within the crystals — which gives more clues as to whether the rock cooled slowly or quickly. The scientists concluded that some ancient river must have carved out a chasm roughly the shape and size of the Grand Canyon by around 70 million years ago.

Not everyone is convinced by the new findings, which build on earlier work from the same research team. Karl Karlstrom, a geologist at the University of New Mexico, says that there must have been canyons throughout the area 70 million years ago, but most geological evidence supports the modern canyon — what visitors see today when standing at the rim — appearing only in the last 5 million to 6 million years.

Also check the New York Times and Science for more.

eating meat helped our brains evolve

From Christopher Wanjek in the Washington Post:

At the core of this research is the understanding that the modern human brain consumes 20 percent of the body’s energy at rest, twice that of other primates. Meat and cooked foods were needed to provide the necessary calorie boost to feed a growing brain.

One study, published last month in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, examined the brain size of several primates. For the most part, larger bodies have larger brains across species. Yet humans have exceptionally large, neuron-rich brains for our body size, while gorillas — three times as massive as humans — have smaller brains with one-third the neurons. Why?

The answer, it seems, is the gorillas’ raw, vegan diet (devoid of animal protein), which requires hours upon hours of eating to provide enough calories to support their mass.

Researchers from Brazil, led by Suzana Herculano-Houzel, a neuroscientist at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, calculated that adding neurons to the primate brain comes at a fixed cost of approximately six calories per billion neurons.

For gorillas to evolve a humanlike brain, they would need an additional 733 calories a day, which would require two more hours of feeding, the authors wrote. A gorilla already spends as much as 80 percent of the tropics’ 12 hours of daylight eating.

Tell your vegetarian friends to chew on that.

//whootitoukrol.net/4/4535925